Journal of Stress Physiology & Biochemistry, Vol. 11 No. 2 2015, pp. 64-72 ISSN 1997-0838
Original Text Copyright (cc) 2015 by  Enikeev, Kopytina, Maximova, Nurminskaya, Shafikova, Rusaleva, Fedoseeva and Shvetsov



ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Full text in PDF Download to Citation Manager Permanent urlData source :  Google Scholar
QueryDate : 2016-12-24
Cites : 2
         

Physiological Consequences of Genetic Transformation: Result of Target Gene Expression or Stress Reaction?

A.G. Enikeev, T.V. Kopytina, L.A. Maximova, Yu.V. Nurminskaya, T.N. Shafikova, T.M. Rusaleva, I.V. Fedoseeva, S.G. Shvetsov

 Siberian Institute of Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, Irkutsk, 664033, Russia
Email: enikeev@sifibr.irk.ru

Received June 3, 2015

The transgenic and non-transgenic tobacco cell cultures were analyzed for resistance to abiotic and biotic stress. The different physiological reaction of cell culture depending on T-DNA structure (or transgen structure) was observed. The cell culture transformed by disarmed Agrobacterium tumefaciense A699 with pCNL 65 nptII demonstrated the same stress-resistance as non-transgenic control cell culture. The cell culture transformed by Agrobacterium tumefaciense LBA 4400 pBiCaMV nptII + hsp101 showed a raised stress-resistance to high temperature, high KF concentration, and to the action of Clavibacter michiganensis ssp sepidonicus. Obviously, the expression of transferred arabodopsis gene hsp101 provides protection properties of transgenic cell culture under the influence of various stress factors. Moreover, that agrobacterial transformation as previous stress-factor is supposed to make a contribution to formation of transgenic cell culture cross-resistance.


Key words:    Nicotiana tabacum L., agrobacterial transformation, transgenic cell culture, physiological peculiarities, biotic and abiotic stressing factors, cross-resistance

Back to issue content
интернет статистика
Free blog 

counters